| Conversation with Cardinal Danielou"Thou Shalt Not Kill" or "Thou Shalt Not
      Murder"?At a monastic retreat near Paris, in July of 1973, Srila Prabhupada
      talked with Cardinal Jean Danielou: "... the Bible does
      not simply say, `Do not kill the human being.' It says broadly,
      `Thou shalt not kill.'... why do you interpret this to suit your
      own convenience?"
 Srila Prabhupada: Jesus Christ said, "Thou shalt
      not kill." So why is it that the Christian people are engaged
      in animal killing?
 Cardinal Danielou: Certainly in Christianity it
      is forbidden to kill, but we believe that there is a difference
      between the life of a human being and the life of the beasts.
      The life of a human being is sacred because man is made in the
      image of God; therefore, to kill a human being is forbidden.
 Srila Prabhupada: But the Bible does not simply say, "Do
      not kill the human being." It says broadly, "Thou shalt
      not kill."
 Cardinal Danielou: We believe that only human life
      is sacred.
 Srila Prabhupada: That is your interpretation. The commandment
      is "Thou shalt not kill."
 Cardinal Danielou: It is necessary for man to kill
      animals in order to have food to eat.
 Srila Prabhupada: No. Man can eat grains, vegetables,
      fruits, and milk.
 Cardinal Danielou: No flesh?
 Srila Prabhupada: No. Human beings are meant to eat vegetarian
      food. The tiger does not come to eat your fruits. His prescribed
      food is animal flesh. But man's food is vegetables, fruits, grains,
      and milk products. So how can you say that animal killing is
      not a sin?
 Cardinal Danielou: We believe it is a question
      of motivation. If the killing of an animal is for giving food
      to the hungry, then it is justified.
 Srila Prabhupada: But consider the cow: we drink her milk;
      therefore, she is our mother. Do you agree?
 Cardinal Danielou: Yes, surely.
 Srila Prabhupada: So if the cow is your mother, how can
      you support killing her? You take the milk from her, and when
      she's old and cannot give you milk, you cut her throat. Is that
      a very humane proposal? In India those who are meat-eaters are
      advised to kill some lower animals like goats, pigs, or even
      buffalo. But cow killing is the greatest sin. In preaching Krsna
      consciousness we ask people not to eat any kind of meat, and
      my disciples strictly follow this principle. But if, under certain
      circumstances, others are obliged to eat meat, then they should
      eat the flesh of some lower animal. Don't kill cows. It is the
      greatest sin. And as long as a man is sinful, he cannot understand
      God. The human being's main business is to understand God and
      to love Him. But if you remain sinful, you will never be able
      to understand God-what to speak of loving Him.
 Cardinal Danielou: I think that perhaps this is
      not an essential point. The important thing is to love God. The
      practical commandments can vary from one religion to the next.
 Srila Prabhupada: So, in the Bible God's practical commandment
      is that you cannot kill; therefore killing cows is a sin for
      you.
 Cardinal Danielou: God says to the Indians that
      killing is not good, and he says to the Jews that...
 Srila Prabhupada: No, no. Jesus Christ taught, "Thou
      shalt not kill." Why do you interpret this to suit your
      own convenience?
 Cardinal Danielou: But Jesus allowed the sacrifice
      of the Paschal Lamb.
 Srila Prabhupada: But he never maintained a slaughterhouse.
 Cardinal Danielou: [Laughs.] No, but he did eat
      meat.
 Srila Prabhupada: When there is no other food, someone
      may eat meat in order to keep from starving. That is another
      thing. But it is most sinful to regularly maintain slaughterhouses
      just to satisfy your tongue. Actually, you will not even have
      a human society until this cruel practice of maintaining slaughterhouses
      is stopped. And although animal killing may sometimes be necessary
      for survival, at least the mother animal, the cow, should not
      be killed. That is simply human decency. In the Krsna consciousness
      movement our practice is that we don't allow the killing of any
      animals. Krsna says, patram puspam phalam toyam yo me bhaktya
      prayacchati: "Vegetables, fruits, milk, and grains should
      be offered to Me in devotion." (Bhagavad-gita 9.26) We take
      only the remnants of Krsna's food (prasadam). The trees offer
      us many varieties of fruits, but the trees are not killed. Of
      course, one living entity is food for another living entity,
      but that does not mean you can kill your mother for food. Cows
      are innocent; they give us milk. You take their milk-and then
      kill them in the slaughterhouse. This is sinful.
 Student: Srila Prabhupada, Christianity's sanction
      of meat-eating is based on the view that lower species of life
      do not have a soul like the human being's.
 Srila Prabhupada: That is foolishness. First of all, we
      have to understand the evidence of the soul's presence within
      the body. Then we can see whether the human being has a soul
      and the cow does not. What are the different characteristics
      of the cow and the man? If we find a difference in characteristics,
      then we can say that in the animal there is no soul. But if we
      see that the animal and the human being have the same characteristics,
      then how can you say that the animal has no soul? The general
      symptoms are that the animal eats, you eat; the animal sleeps,
      you sleep; the animal mates, you mate; the animal defends, and
      you defend. Where is the difference?
 Cardinal Danielou: We admit that in the animal
      there may be the same type of biological existence as in men,
      but there is no soul. We believe that the soul is a human soul.
 Srila Prabhupada: Our Bhagavad-gita says sarva-yonisu,
      "In all species of life the soul exists." The body
      is like a suit of clothes. You have black clothes; I am dressed
      in saffron clothes. But within the dress you are a human being,
      and I am also a human being. Similarly, the bodies of the different
      species are just like different types of dress. There are soul,
      a part and parcel of God. Suppose a man has two sons, not equally
      meritorious. One may be a Supreme Court judge and the other may
      be a common laborer, but the father claims both as his sons.
      He does not make the distinction that the son who is a judge
      is very important and the worker-son is not important. And if
      the judge-son says, "My dear father, your other son is useless;
      let me cut him up and eat him," will the father allow this?
 Cardinal Danielou: Certainly not, but the idea
      that all life is part of the life of God is difficult for us
      to admit. There is a great difference between human life and
      animal life.
 Srila Prabhupada: That difference is due to the development
      of consciousness. In the human body there is developed consciousness.
      Even a tree has a soul, but a tree's consciousness is not very
      developed. If you cut a tree it does not resist. Actually, it
      does resist, but only to a very small degree. There is a scientist
      named Jagadish Chandra Bose who has made a machine which shows
      that trees and plants are able to feel pain when they are cut.
      And we can see directly that when someone comes to kill an animal,
      it resists, it cries, it makes a horrible sound. So it is a matter
      of the development of consciousness. But the soul is there within
      all living beings.
 Cardinal Danielou: But metaphysically, the life
      of man is sacred. Human beings think on a higher platform than
      the animals do.
 Srila Prabhupada: What is that higher platform? The animal
      eats to maintain his body, and you also eat in order to maintain
      your body. The cow eats grass in the field, and the human being
      eats meat from a huge slaughterhouse full of modern machines.
      But just because you have big machines and a ghastly scene, while
      the animal simply eats grass, this does not mean that you are
      so advanced that only within your body is there a soul and that
      there is not a soul within the body of the animal. That is illogical.
      We can see that the basic characteristics are the same in the
      animal and the human being.
 Cardinal Danielou: But only in human beings do
      we find a metaphysical search for the meaning of life.
 Srila Prabhupada: Yes. So metaphysically search out why
      you believe that there is no soul within the animal-that is metaphysics.
      If you are thinking metaphysically, that's all right. But if
      you are thinking like an animal, then what is the use of your
      metaphysical study? Metaphysical means "above the physical"
      or, in other words, "spiritual." In the Bhagavad-gita
      Krsna says, sarva-yonisu kaunteya: "In every living being
      there is a spirit soul." That is metaphysical understanding.
      Now either you accept Krsna's teachings as metaphysical, or you'll
      have to take a third-class fool's opinion as metaphysical. Which
      do you accept?
 Cardinal Danielou: But why does God create some
      animals who eat other animals? There is a fault in the creation,
      it seems.
 Srila Prabhupada: It is not a fault. God is very kind.
      If you want to eat animals, then He'll give you full facility.
      God will give you the body of a tiger in your next life so that
      you can eat flesh very freely. "Why are you maintaining
      slaughterhouses? I'll give you fangs and claws. Now eat."
      So the meat-eaters are awaiting such punishment. The animal-eaters
      become tigers, wolves, cats, and dogs in their next life-to get
      more facility.
 
 |